Nikon D100 Digital Camera Sample Photos and Specifications

photo sharing and upload

picture albums

photo forums

search pictures

popular photos

photography help

login

The PBase Camera Museum is intended to be a resource about all camera equipment.
You can help by leaving a comment here including any information you know about this camera equipment.
Please do not post anything that contains copyrighted work for which you do not have permission to publish.
Your comments may be assimilated in to other parts of the PBase Camera Museum but will also remain here in their original form with credit to you.
Contact cameras@pbase.com

All Cameras >> Nikon >> Nikon D100

Nikon D100 SLR Digital Camera Sample Photos

u37/equipment/upload/24297997.nikonD100.gif

Marketed: 21-Feb-2002

Megapixels: 6.1

Random Nikon D100 Samples from 218064 available Photos more

Comments

J Ponces		18-Mar-2013 14:29
Rob, what do you mean by 'better'? Generally yes, But I would definitely say the D70 is better! I bought one for my daughter instead of a D100....

Rob Craftsman		30-Jul-2012 21:31
Does anyone else agree that the D80 is better?

air ambulance		20-Jun-2012 20:51
LOVE the shot with the leaves.

SuperFoods		25-May-2012 10:18
I love the D100. Takes great photos.

simontander		04-Nov-2011 13:02
A classi cone, maybe Nikon's last great DSLR before they got all fancy. I had to re-register, just to say there used to 800,000+ images last time I was here, What happened?

Guest		15-Jan-2008 14:05
New List Professional Digital SLR Camera 1. Nikon D3 2. Nikon D2Xs 3. Canon 1Ds Mark 3 4. Canon 1D Mark 3 Semi Professional Digital SLR Camera 1. Nikon D300 2. Nikon D200 3. Canon 5D 4. Canon 40D 5. Pentax K10D 6. Fuji S5 Pro 7. Canon 30D 8. Nikon D80 9. Nikon D40x 10. Canon 400D

Dave Beedon		19-Jul-2007 21:28
My first digital camera was a D100, bought in September 2003. It served me well for three years, then over a period of about two months the exposure controls became slightly unreliable. In October 2006 it "died": it set exposures according to whatever mood it was in; manual mode became completely unusable. (I explain the experience here:http://www.pbase.com/listorama/image/68120954 .) The D100 was replaced by a D80, whose features and ease of operation are much better than those of the D100. This can be an expensive hobby.

Guest		23-Apr-2007 19:04
Still use this camera, see lots of these in nature reserves, and it should see me through another couple of year.

Guest		26-Mar-2007 01:18
DEAR SHANNON, RE: SWIFT TRANSFER OF US$11 MILLION INTO YOUR ACCOUNT MY NAME IS MR KOFFI UMARU. I AM THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF ECO BANK INTERNATIONAL GHANA IN THE WESTERN REGION OF GHANA. I GOT YOUR INFORMATION FROM A FRIEND WHO IS A MEMBER OF OUR TRADE MISSION. I WRITE YOU THIS PROPOSAL IN GOOD FAITH. I AM 42 YEARS OLD MARRIED WITH TWO LOVELY KIDS. I AM A DEVOTED CHRISTIAN AND A MAN OF PEACE. I HAVE PACKAGED A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION THAT WILL BENEFIT YOU AND I. AS THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF THE ECO BANK TERNATIONAL GHANA. IT IS MY DUTY TO SEND IN A FINANCIAL REPORT TO MY HEAD OFFICE IN THE CAPITAL CITY ACCRA AT THE END OF EACH BUSINESS YEAR. IN THE COURSE OF THE LAST YEAR 2006 BUSINESS REPORT. I DISCOVERED THAT MY REGION IN WHICH I AM THE MANAGER MADE 11 MILLION US DOLLARS ($11.000.000.00) WHICH MY HEAD OFFICE ARE NOT AWARE OF AND WILL NEVER BE AWARE OF. I HAVE PLACED THIS FUNDS ON WHAT WE CALL ESCROW CALL ACCOUNT WITH NO BENEFICIARY. AS AN OFFICER OF THIS BANK I CAN NOT BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THIS MONEY. SO MY AIM OF CONTACTING YOU IS TO ASSIST ME RECEIVE THIS MONEY IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND GET 20% OF THE TOTAL FUNDS AS COMMISSION. THERE ARE PRACTICALLY NO RISK INVOLVED. IT WILL BE A BANK TO BANK TRANSFER; ALL I NEED FROM YOU IS TO STAND CLAIM AS THE ORIGINAL DEPOSITOR OF THIS FUND WHO MADE THE EPOSIT WITH MY BRANCH SO THAT MY HEAD OFFICE CAN ORDER THE TRANSFER TO YOUR DESIGNATED BANK ACCOUNT. IF YOU ACCEPT TO WORK WITH ME I WILL APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. REPLY ME THROUGH MY PRIVATE EMAIL BELOW IF YOU THINK WE CAN WORK TOGETHER SO THAT WE CAN GO OVER THE DETAILS. CONTACT ME IMMEDIATELY AND ONLY THROUGH THIS EMAIL ADDRESS (koffiumaru@24.com) THANKS IN ADVANCE AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY. YOURS TRULY MR KOFFI UMARU

Guest		11-Mar-2006 01:23
After some time, and having my new D-200 I have to say that the D-100 is a great camera, a bit too slow, but unless you don't have to make high speed photography it is perfectly fine, Since the last posting I don't know how many photos more I have made, but quite a few and it still works perfectly well if we exclude a bit of a contact problem with the WB knob it has fullfilled all the expetatives I had of this camera and more, and though now I mainly have it retired I still keep it as a second camera or as a backup one for what ever may happen with the D200. I also agree with what Alfred Arzt sais quite a bit, I even and say that I did an exhibition of photos that were 100x80 and it standed quite well the quality though I shot it in JPG "high"... anyway I recognize that transforming it in BW as I did also helped to keep the pixels in an apparent small size. Well, for me the D100 was the welcome to a new photographic era, the digital one, and it has been a good school and a good camera during all these years that I have had it.

Guest		16-Feb-2006 00:29
Love my D100 and F100. Everything I need!!!

Alfred Arzt		09-Feb-2006 12:27
For me it was a very good camera. I had it 3 years till i got my d200 one moth ago. Had a lot of published pictures with it, for exapmle lot of page 3 girl pictures in Austrian Newspapers:http://www.pbase.com/artalf/black__white. Made also very good big prints: size 50x75cm out of d100 raw files, they are briliant. High iso is good enogh up 1250 iso. 1600 iso is a bit noisy, more than in most modern DSLRS of today, but 800 iso is very good. lots of d100 pix in:http://www.pbase.com/artalf

Guest		07-Feb-2006 11:30
Still in use and very good results. Bettered only by costly SLRs.

Guest		30-Oct-2005 11:23
Had mine since it was first released and it's still running strong. Was a great investment. Cory www.pbase.com/bamburg

Guest		31-Jan-2005 05:57
It's the first I hear about the CCD overheating? Is Xabier talking about continuous use? From what I've read, Canon and Olympus have bigger problems with auto-focus (AF) than Nikon. The D-100 is a great camera. For professionals it is without a doubt better than the light-weight, consumer-oriented, marketed-into-popularity D70. About AF: Many photographers would be better at focusing manually than even the latest AF technology standards. The biggest gripes I have with AF (digital) SLR's is that, (1)the manufacturers seem to refuse to produce compatible manual focus lenses for the auto-focus cameras, and that, (2)there is no AF or MF standard prime lens (mass-produced and light 33mm f1.4 in Nikon) for the smaller digital sensors.

Guest		23-Nov-2004 10:55
Well, I can say several good and bad things about it. The good ones are: It is quite a bit stronger then it looks like at first hand. I bought one of the first ones that arrived here in Spain, and by now I probably have done arround 300.000 shots without a problem. (some collegues have had problems with the shooter). It has many features in the menu and it is complete PRO. camera and it's resolution is not bad, aldo it is recomendable to shoot with High JPG, RAW or TIFF for maximum performance. Bad Things: Nikon still didn't solve the AF precission problems that they have ben having since the F-90X, at least this is my feeleng. The CCD is not as stable as one wold like, in a serial shot of photos not all photos come out exposed as you wold wish, not even in manual. In large exposures, the CCD heats up and makes an image that has noise (specles). It doesen't con vince me it's saturation an contrast, I don't think that it is convinient to do a print without touching the photo with the photoshop, and aldo it has a good latitud on low lights, the high lights do... it looses detail very easely. In this aspect I think that you can compare any photo with a 800 ASA slide film. (personal opinion) Anyway, I think that it is a good camera all in all, spetially dedicated for professionals that are use to the digital processes.

All photos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission from the photographer.
These photos are are a guide to what these cameras are capable of, but may not fully represent the camera due to post-processing, scanning, or photographic technique.
All brands are trademarked by their owners.
These pages are not sponsored or approved by the manufacturers.
Other content Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006, pbase.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Contact cameras@pbase.com to contribute data or photos of cameras.